Skip to main content

Learn article

The STRYDE Nail and Weight-Bearing Internal Lengthening Devices

What the STRYDE nail was, why it was withdrawn from the market, what corrosion and osteolysis findings led to the recall, and the current state of weight-bearing internal lengthening nail development.

Stage: planningCategory: methodsUpdated 2026-07-15

Showing the English original.

In brief

What should readers understand about The STRYDE Nail and Weight-Bearing Internal Lengthening Devices?

What the STRYDE nail was, why it was withdrawn from the market, what corrosion and osteolysis findings led to the recall, and the current state of weight-bearing internal lengthening nail development.

Limits: This page is educational context only and is not medical advice.

Evidence
Source-backed
Source set
Official public sources
Updated
References
4 listed

Editorial responsibility: Limb Lengthening Library editorial team. Independent medical review is not claimed unless a named reviewer is listed. How sources are reviewed.

Current Status in One Sentence

is not a current U.S. implant option: the FDA states that stainless-steel devices, including , remain recalled and should not be implanted. is a separate titanium system with 510(k) clearance and a separate Class II recall covering specified catalog and lot combinations. Do not treat it as an automatic successor or infer the status and load limit of a particular unit from the family name. [1][2][4]

Why STRYDE Mattered

was a stainless-steel magnetically driven lengthening nail designed to tolerate higher loading than earlier titanium configurations. Greater permitted loading could change transfers, walking practice, and daily independence. Those intended advantages must be considered alongside the later biocompatibility concerns and recall.

What Follow-Up Studies Reported

A matched-pair analysis reported in 31 of 48 segments versus 1 of 91 segments. The study also reported and pain findings, while observing that generally resolved after implant removal. Observational results do not establish that every recipient will have the same outcome. [3]

FDA Guidance

The FDA's June 2023 update says stainless-steel Bone Transport, Plate, and devices remain recalled from the U.S. market due to adverse events related to potential biocompatibility concerns and should not be implanted. The same update distinguishes the titanium IMLL system and reminds clinicians to follow its current instructions, including removal after one year. [1]

PRECICE MAX Has a Separate, Lot-Specific Recall Record

received 510(k) clearance in December 2023. The manufacturer initiated a recall on September 30, 2024 over potential design, manufacturing, and validation-documentation issues. The FDA Class II record lists specified catalog and lot combinations, remained open when updated on July 14, 2026, and tells customers to stop using and return affected unimplanted devices. The record does not by itself establish that every later or current unit is recalled or commercially available. [2][4]

A product described as stronger or designed for higher loading is not automatically available, unrecalled, appropriate for a particular patient, or permitted for full loading in every phase.

How to Verify a Weight-Bearing Claim

  • Ask for the exact model and diameter, not only the brand family.
  • Read the current instructions for use and recall record for the country of treatment.
  • Clarify whether the limit applies to one nail, one limb, or total loading with implants.
  • Confirm how the limit changes during distraction and and after any complication.
  • Follow the treating surgeon's written restriction when it is stricter than a device maximum.

Informational only. Not medical advice.